Court Rules Wife Achraf Hakimi’s Wife To Share Her Net Worth She Accrued During That Period With Her Husband

 Court Rules Wife Must Shear

A recent court ruling in Italy has made headlines as it ordered Achraf Hakimi's wife to share her net worth accrued during their marriage with her husband. The ruling has sparked controversy and debate over the issue of marital property and its distribution in case of separation or divorce.

Achraf Hakimi is a Moroccan professional footballer who currently plays for Paris Saint-Germain. He was previously a member of Inter Milan, where he met and married his wife, Hiba Abouk. The couple got married in 2018 and have a son together.

However, the couple announced their separation in June 2021, citing irreconcilable differences. Following their separation, Hakimi filed a lawsuit in Italy seeking a share of his wife's net worth, which he claimed had increased significantly during their marriage.

Read Also: Moment Achraf Hakimi’s Wife Allegedly Filed For Divorce For The Player’s Properties Only To Find Out That He Has All His Assets In His Mother’s Name

The court ruled in Hakimi's favor, ordering his wife to share her net worth accrued during the period of their marriage. This ruling has been controversial, with some arguing that it is unfair and others supporting it as a way to ensure equitable distribution of marital property.

The debate over the division of marital property is not new. Different countries have different laws and regulations regarding the division of assets in case of separation or divorce. In some countries, such as the United States, marital property is generally divided equally between the spouses, while in others, such as Italy, it is divided based on the principles of equity and fairness.

In the case of Hakimi and his wife, the court ruled that since their marriage, his wife's net worth had increased significantly, partly due to her successful acting career. Therefore, the court ordered her to share her net worth with her husband as a way to ensure a fair distribution of their joint assets.

Some critics of the ruling argue that it is unfair to force someone to share their hard-earned wealth with their spouse, especially if they are the primary breadwinner. They argue that this ruling could discourage people from pursuing successful careers and could lead to a lack of motivation to work hard and accumulate wealth.

However, supporters of the ruling argue that marriage is a partnership, and both spouses contribute to the family's success in different ways. They argue that it is only fair to share the wealth accrued during the marriage, especially if one spouse has significantly contributed to its accumulation.

In conclusion, the court's ruling in the case of Achraf Hakimi and his wife has sparked a debate over the division of marital property. While some argue that it is unfair to force someone to share their wealth, others see it as a way to ensure equitable distribution of assets between spouses. Regardless of the debate, it is essential to have clear laws and regulations regarding the division of marital property to avoid ambiguity and conflict in case of separation or divorce.